Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBouvery, L
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-21T08:42:05Z
dc.date.issued2021-06-07
dc.description.abstractThe oil and gas industry is one of the most investor-State dispute intensive. Numerous disputes necessarily entail a dispute resolution mechanism. In oil and gas investment contracts, parties provide for arbitration, in order to avoid risks pertaining to national courts. Arbitration is an ADRM, and arbitral awards benefit from international recognition and enforcement before national courts. Arbitration is however a last resort mechanism: parties refer their dispute to arbitration when their relationship is severed without hope to mend it. It has become a heavy dispute resolution mechanism, whose procedure generally lasts years and generates high costs. Considering the long span of oil and gas investment contracts, preserving the relationship between the investor and the Host State is crucial, and arbitration does not appear as the best solution. Disputes should therefore be evacuated as swiftly as possible, resorting to arbitration as a last chance mechanism. Yet, the large number of arbitrations demonstrates that oil and gas investment contracts do not present the necessary and efficient mechanisms to solve the disputes before the contractual relationship is ruined. The insertion of an efficient MTDR clause, with well-interacting ADRMs, would provide the parties with the means to solve their disputes early, protect their relationship and filter disputes as to granting access to arbitration to the most complex disputes only. The MTDR clause proposed will comprise ADRMs already existing in actual contracts and therefore supported by practice. The clause will be supplemented by a DB clause, an ADRM borrowed from the construction industry which has a proven efficacy. Finally, the clause will not be complete without inserting and recognising specific contract clauses, force majeure and stabilisation clauses, which are not ADRMs per se but have been elevated to a dispute prevention and resolution level by industry and arbitral practice, i.e. lex petrolea.en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/126114
dc.publisherUniversity of Exeteren_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonPublication of thesisen_GB
dc.subjectInternational Arbitrationen_GB
dc.subjectLex Petroleaen_GB
dc.subjectAlternative Dispute Resolutionen_GB
dc.subjectInternational lawen_GB
dc.subjectTechnical Advisory Committeeen_GB
dc.subjectDispute Boarden_GB
dc.subjectExpert Determinationen_GB
dc.subjectMulti Tiered Dispute Resolution Clauseen_GB
dc.subjectOil and gasen_GB
dc.subjectInvestmenten_GB
dc.titleLex Petrolea, Arbitration and other Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanisms in oil and gas investment contracts: a critical analysisen_GB
dc.typeThesis or dissertationen_GB
dc.date.available2021-06-21T08:42:05Z
dc.contributor.advisorNousia, Ken_GB
dc.contributor.advisorCaine, Cen_GB
dc.contributor.advisorMerkin, Ren_GB
dc.publisher.departmentLawen_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden_GB
dc.type.degreetitlePhD in Lawen_GB
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_GB
dc.type.qualificationnameDoctoral Thesisen_GB
rioxxterms.versionNAen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-06-08
rioxxterms.typeThesisen_GB
refterms.dateFOA2021-06-21T08:42:15Z


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record