Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKal, EC
dc.contributor.authorYoung, WR
dc.contributor.authorEllmers, TJ
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-22T11:25:50Z
dc.date.issued2022-02-05
dc.date.updated2022-02-22T11:02:17Z
dc.description.abstractOlder adults rely increasingly on conscious processes to control balance. While this could be in response to age-related declines in balance capacity, it is unclear whether such strategy is adaptive or not. We investigated whether balance capacity modified the effects of conscious movement processing (CMP) on postural control in older adults. Forty-seven older adults (Mage = 74.8, range = 61-88) completed 60-s, narrow-stance balance trials on a force platform, under conditions designed to increase (high-CMP; through movement-monitoring instructions) or reduce conscious processing (low-CMP; distraction task). Balance capacity was operationalised as a composite score of Berg Balance Scale and Timed-up-and-Go. Balance capacity influenced the effects of the CMP manipulation on mediolateral sway amplitude (p = .023). Specifically, it positively associated with sway amplitude during the high-CMP condition (β = 0.273), but not low-CMP condition (β = -0.060). In other words, higher balance capacity was associated with increased sway during high-CMP, confirming our hypothesis that CMP does not uniformly negatively impact balance performance. Rather, CMP was maladaptive for those with better balance. Results also indicated that older adults' balance capacity influenced the degree to which they could engage conscious or automatic postural control processes. Specifically, we found that, overall, participants showed reduced mediolateral sway frequency and complexity for the high-CMP vs. low-CMP condition (p's ≤ 0.018), indicating reduced automaticity of balance (as expected). However, these effects were significantly attenuated as balance capacity reduced (i.e., smaller changes in those with lower balance capacity, p's < 0.010). Hence, the ability to readily shift between conscious and automatic modes of postural control seems more constrained as balance becomes worse. Overall, these findings suggest clinicians need to consider older adults' balance capacity when using providing instructions or feedback likely to influence CMP within rehabilitation settings.en_GB
dc.format.extent102933-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.identifier.citationVol. 82, article 102933en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2022.102933
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/128863
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0002-5064-8601 (Young, William R)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherElsevieren_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35134657en_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonUnder embargo until 5 August 2023 in compliance with publisher policyen_GB
dc.rights© 2022 Elsevier B.V. This version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/  en_GB
dc.subjectConscious movement processingen_GB
dc.subjectInternal focusen_GB
dc.subjectMovement reinvestmenten_GB
dc.subjectOlder adultsen_GB
dc.subjectPostural controlen_GB
dc.titleBalance capacity influences the effects of conscious movement processing on postural control in older adultsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2022-02-22T11:25:50Z
dc.identifier.issn0167-9457
exeter.article-number102933
exeter.place-of-publicationNetherlands
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Elsevier via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1872-7646
dc.identifier.journalHuman Movement Scienceen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofHum Mov Sci, 82
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/  en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-01-27
rioxxterms.versionAMen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2022-02-05
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2022-02-22T11:21:31Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.panelCen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2022 Elsevier B.V. This version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/  
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2022 Elsevier B.V. This version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/