Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRickard, IJ
dc.contributor.authorVullioud, C
dc.contributor.authorRousset, F
dc.contributor.authorPostma, E
dc.contributor.authorHelle, S
dc.contributor.authorLummaa, V
dc.contributor.authorKylli, R
dc.contributor.authorPettay, JE
dc.contributor.authorRøskaft, E
dc.contributor.authorSkjærvø, GR
dc.contributor.authorStörmer, C
dc.contributor.authorVoland, E
dc.contributor.authorWaldvogel, D
dc.contributor.authorCourtiol, A
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-08T08:24:58Z
dc.date.issued2022-05-24
dc.date.updated2022-07-08T08:15:35Z
dc.description.abstractHistorically, mothers producing twins gave birth, on average, more often than non-twinners. This observation has been interpreted as twinners having higher intrinsic fertility - a tendency to conceive easily irrespective of age and other factors - which has shaped both hypotheses about why twinning persists and varies across populations, and the design of medical studies on female fertility. Here we show in >20k pre-industrial European mothers that this interpretation results from an ecological fallacy: twinners had more births not due to higher intrinsic fertility, but because mothers that gave birth more accumulated more opportunities to produce twins. Controlling for variation in the exposure to the risk of twinning reveals that mothers with higher twinning propensity - a physiological predisposition to producing twins - had fewer births, and when twin mortality was high, fewer offspring reaching adulthood. Twinning rates may thus be driven by variation in its mortality costs, rather than variation in intrinsic fertility.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipProjekt DEALen_GB
dc.format.extent2886-
dc.format.mediumElectronic
dc.identifier.citationVol. 13, No. 1, article 2886en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-30366-9
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/130189
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0003-0856-1294 (Postma, Erik)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherNature Researchen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35610216en_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://github.com/courtiol/twinRen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6551399en_GB
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2022. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/4.0/.en_GB
dc.subjectBehavioural ecologyen_GB
dc.subjectBiological anthropologyen_GB
dc.subjectHuman behaviouren_GB
dc.subjectStatistical methodsen_GB
dc.titleMothers with higher twinning propensity had lower fertility in pre-industrial Europe.en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2022-07-08T08:24:58Z
dc.identifier.issn2041-1723
exeter.article-number2886
exeter.place-of-publicationEngland
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available from Nature Research via the DOI in this record. en_GB
dc.descriptionData availability: The data generated in this study are provided in Supplementary Data 1. They are also available within the supporting R package called twinR (https://github.com/courtiol/twinR) which has been archived within the Zenodo repository: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6551399.en_GB
dc.descriptionCode availability: The R code behind this paper is available within the supporting R package called twinR (https://github.com/courtiol/twinR) which has been archived within the Zenodo repository: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6551399.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalNature Communicationsen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofNat Commun, 13(1)
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-04-27
dc.rights.licenseCC BY
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2022-05-24
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2022-07-08T08:22:03Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2022-07-08T08:25:58Z
refterms.panelAen_GB
refterms.dateFirstOnline2022-05-24


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© The Author(s) 2022. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing,
adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give
appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative
Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party
material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless
indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the
article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory
regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from
the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/
licenses/by/4.0/.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © The Author(s) 2022. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/4.0/.