Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorStoebenau, K
dc.contributor.authorDunkle, K
dc.contributor.authorWillan, S
dc.contributor.authorShai, N
dc.contributor.authorGibbs, A
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-17T10:33:30Z
dc.date.issued2023-01-02
dc.date.updated2023-02-17T10:21:06Z
dc.description.abstractFor women in South Africa, engaging in exchange sex, including transactional sex (TS), or sex work (SW), is associated with several shared poor health outcomes; yet the practices themselves differ in meaningful ways. SW is a form of commodity exchange, while TS is grounded in gendered relationship expectations of male provision and aspects of emotional intimacy. Additionally, exchange sex types could be imagined on a "continuum of instrumentality" from relationships that do not include material support; to those characterized, but not driven by support; to those primarily motivated by material support. We use cross-sectional data from 644 women ages 18-30 enrolled in a trial addressing intimate partner violence in urban KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa to assess whether these conceptualizations may also map onto different types or levels of risk. Using self-reports, we developed four exchange sex relationship categories corresponding to a continuum of instrumentality: no exchange-based relationship; TS with a main partner only; TS with a casual partner; and SW. Using tests of association and adjusted logistic regression models, we compared socio-economic and behavioural risk factors, and health outcomes across reported forms of exchange sex. We find little difference between women who report no exchange sex and those who report TS only with a main partner. By contrast, as compared to women not in exchange sex, women in casual TS and SW were poorer, and significantly more likely to report problematic alcohol use, past drug use, prior non-partner sexual violence, and PTSD; with aOR higher for women in SW for many outcomes. When comparing casual TS to SW, we find women in SW held more gender equitable attitudes and were more likely to report modern contraceptive use. We discuss the implications for distinguishing between TS and SW, and use of the continuum of instrumentality conceptualization for research and programming.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipUKRIen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipSouth African Medical Research Councilen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipUK Department for International Developmenten_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipGCRFen_GB
dc.format.extent115637-
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.identifier.citationVol. 318, article 115637en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115637
dc.identifier.grantnumberMR/T029803/1en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/132495
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0003-2812-5377 (Gibbs, Andrew)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherElsevieren_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36628880en_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://medat.samrc.ac.za/index.php/catalog/WWen_GB
dc.rights© 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en_GB
dc.subjectAdolescent girls and young womenen_GB
dc.subjectHIV risken_GB
dc.subjectMental healthen_GB
dc.subjectSex worken_GB
dc.subjectSouth Africaen_GB
dc.subjectTransactional sexen_GB
dc.subjectViolenceen_GB
dc.titleAssessing risk factors and health impacts across different forms of exchange sex among young women in informal settlements in South Africa: A cross-sectional study.en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2023-02-17T10:33:30Z
dc.identifier.issn0277-9536
exeter.article-number115637
exeter.place-of-publicationEngland
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available from Elsevier via the DOI in this record. en_GB
dc.descriptionData availability: Data are available at: https://medat.samrc.ac.za/index.php/catalog/WWen_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1873-5347
dc.identifier.journalSocial Science & Medicineen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofSoc Sci Med, 318
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-12-23
dc.rights.licenseCC BY
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2023-01-02
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2023-02-17T10:27:23Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2023-02-17T10:33:32Z
refterms.panelAen_GB
refterms.dateFirstOnline2023-01-02


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).