Assessing the association between global structural brain age and polygenic risk for schizophrenia in early adulthood: a recall-by-genotype study
Constantinides, C; Baltramonaityte, V; Caramaschi, D; et al.Han, LKM; Lancaster, TM; Zammit, S; Freeman, TP; Walton, E
Date: 2024
Article
Journal
Cortex
Publisher
Elsevier
Related links
Abstract
Neuroimaging studies consistently show advanced brain age in schizophrenia, suggesting that brain structure is often ‘older’ than expected at a given chronological age. Whether advanced brain age is linked to genetic liability for schizophrenia remains unclear. In this pre-registered secondary data analysis, we utilised a recall-by-genotype ...
Neuroimaging studies consistently show advanced brain age in schizophrenia, suggesting that brain structure is often ‘older’ than expected at a given chronological age. Whether advanced brain age is linked to genetic liability for schizophrenia remains unclear. In this pre-registered secondary data analysis, we utilised a recall-by-genotype approach applied to a population-based subsample from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children to assess brain age differences between young adults aged 21-24 years with relatively high (n=96) and low (n=93) polygenic risk for schizophrenia (SCZ-PRS). A global index of brain age (or brain-predicted age) was estimated using a publicly available machine learning model previously trained on a combination of region-wise gray-matter measures, including cortical thickness, surface area and subcortical volumes derived from T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. We found no difference in mean brain PAD (the difference between brain-predicted age and chronological age) between the high- and low- SCZ-PRS groups, controlling for the effects of sex and age at time of scanning (b = - 0.21;
95% CI -2.00, 1.58; p = 0.82; Cohen’s d = - 0.03; partial R2
= 0.00029). These findings do not support an association between SCZ-PRS and brain-PAD based on global age-related structural brain patterns, suggesting that brain age may not be a vulnerability marker of common genetic risk for SCZ. Future studies with larger samples and multimodal brain age measures could further investigate global or localised effects of SCZ-PRS.
Psychology
Faculty of Health and Life Sciences
Item views 0
Full item downloads 0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2023. This version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/